Peter Reiner

PhD, University of Pennsylvania
Department of Psychiatry

Dr. Reiner is Professor in the National Core for Neuroethics and a member of the Kinsmen Laboratory of Neurological Research, Department of Psychiatry and the Brain Research Centre at the University of British Columbia.  Dr. Reiner has a distinguished track record as a research scientist studying the neurobiology of behavioral states and the molecular underpinnings of neurodegenerative disease.  Dr. Reiner also has experience in the private sector, having been President and CEO of Active Pass Pharmaceuticals, a drug discovery company that he founded to tackle the scourge of Alzheimer's disease.  Upon returning to academic life, Dr. Reiner refocused his scholarly work in the area of neuroethics, with interests in neuroessentialism, the neuroethics of cognitive enhancement, and the commercialization of neuroscience. 

Primary Recipient Awards

International Research Roundtables, Peter Reiner, 2013

Peter Reiner

We Are Our Brains
Principal Investigator(s): Dr. Peter Reiner, National Core for Neuroethics, Department of Psychiatry, UBC.

The panoply of mental phenomena that define who we are– memories and feelings, desires and thoughts, the decisions that we make and the beliefs that we hold dear– are all mediated by events in the brain. Holding a worldview which situates the brain as the key organ that provides meaning to our lives is a perspective often termed neuroessentialism: the notion that we are our brains, and that when we think of who we are as beings interacting in the world, the we that we think of primarily resides in our brains. We are also our bodies, our genes, our books, and more, but neuroessentialists suggest that these are less central to the concept of we than the we that we think of when we think of our brains.

In recent years, the neuroessentialist perspective has moved from its traditional ambit among neuroscientists and philosophers to the larger domain of the public at large, with implications for such diverse fields as art, economics, sociology, and law, to name but a few. The issue that arises is not so much that this neuroessentialist turn is ascendant, but rather the impact that it may have upon society. In many instances, neuroessentialist thinking can be anticipated to be prosocial: displacement of uninformed stigma by the considered understanding that people with addictions and mental illnesses suffer from a change in brain chemistry rather than a defect in character. The relevant question is not whether these musings represent the facts of the matter but rather how might the notion that this might be the way that our brains work affect the general public’s perspectives on interpersonal relationships? How does neuroessentialist thinking intersect with evolving perspectives over the biological bases of sexual preferences? Layered upon this set of enthusiasms and concerns is another important consideration: how might neuroessentialist thinking be perceived in different cultural contexts. The roundtable is intended not to merely review these issues but to address an important normative matter: how should we move forward with the neuroessentialist agenda?


Related Event

Feb 192019
AI & Society Seminar Series It is hard to overstate the degree to which information technology has permeated modern life. For many, reliance on their devices begins when they...
Jan 102012
The Wall Hour
Peter Wall Institute Lounge 8:00 am - 9:00 am RSVP